OpenEik.org

The open building model for AI agents. The building, stored as a code base.

In testing nowPublic in Q4 2026Open sourceBuilt for LLMs
OpenEik

BIM coordination for the agentic era.

One open building model that every discipline and every AI assistant works on together. Agents draft the changes, people review exactly what changed, and the whole team works against the same current model.

01

Ask

Tell Claude, ChatGPT or Copilot what you need. Your assistant edits the model directly: walls, doors, beams, loads.

02

See the change

Every edit is a readable diff: the door that moved, and nothing else.

03

Check and review

Checks run before anything merges, and the discipline that owns the part approves it.

04

Everyone is current

Architect, engineer, contractor and client work on the same model the moment it merges.

The era of LLMs is here

IFC won't cut it.

IFC stores what a building looks like, not what it is. A wall arrives as a mesh with its door holes already cut. Ask an AI agent to change it and it edits dead geometry.

  • Move a door, and the old hole stays in the wall.
  • Move a column, and it no longer stacks.
  • Shorten a corner, and the walls no longer meet.
Why is IFC so hard to edit? Explained simply →
3.4%

of IFC editing tasks fully solved, at best. Seven current models, 324 tasks.

BIM-Edit, June 2026[1]

Why agents fail at IFC

One change, many places

A window is not one record. It is a placement, an opening cut in the host wall, and the relations that tie them together. Move the window and the opening must move with it[1]. Miss one, and the file stays valid while the building is wrong.

Positions are chains

Every placement is relative to another placement, often several levels up. Agents lose track of coordinates and relative placement[2].

A numbered graph, not a text

A real building is hundreds of thousands of lines that point to each other by number. No line makes sense on its own, so the agent has to query the model with code, and it under-explores what is nested deep[3].

Valid is not right

A schema check only proves that the file is well formed. It says nothing about whether the door is where it should be. In our runs, every failing agent reported success.

Independent research agrees

On BIM-Edit, the first shared benchmark for editing IFC, the best of seven current models averages 49.5%, and none fully solves more than 3.4% of its 324 tasks[1]. An agent building IFC models through MCP and IfcOpenShell wrote schema-valid files in every run, yet reached only 40% and 49% model success on two of its six test cases[2]. Even reading IFC is hard: the best agent on ifc-bench v2 answers 56.6% of questions, which its authors call insufficient for unsupervised use in safety-critical work[3].

49.5%

best average score on BIM-Edit, the first shared benchmark for editing IFC.

56.6%

of questions answered by the best agent reading IFC on ifc-bench v2.

BIM-Edit, June 2026[1] · Hellin et al., 2026[3]

And you cannot review the change

Code review works because a diff shows exactly what changed. IFC cannot give you that. A model from leading BIM software, exported twice with nothing changed, differed in 18,659 lines. After five objects were removed and five added, about 295,000 of its 297,000 lines changed[4].

The reason is in the format. IFC is a graph written out as a list, and an exporter is free to number and order it differently every time, so an identical building can come out as a totally different file[4]. In OpenEik every element is its own small file, so the diff of a moved door is the moved door.

99%

of the file rewritten after five objects were removed and five added.

18,659

lines changed between two exports of the same, unchanged model.

Liu, Gao, Gu, EG-ICE 2023[4]

  1. Nithyanantham, Kujat, Sesterhenn, Telgmann, Nedungadi, Plönnigs, Bartelt, Lüdtke. BIM-Edit: Benchmarking Large Language Models for IFC-Based Building Information Modeling. arXiv:2606.20146, 2026.
  2. Heimig-Elschner, Du, Scheuvens, Borrmann, Beetz. A Modular Reference Architecture for MCP-Servers Enabling Agentic BIM Interaction. arXiv:2601.00809, 2025.
  3. Hellin, Jang, Fuchs, Nousias, Borrmann. BIM Information Extraction Through LLM-based Adaptive Exploration. arXiv:2605.01698, 2026.
  4. Liu, Gao, Gu. A Parallel IFC Normalization Algorithm for Incremental Storage and Version Control. EG-ICE 2023, pp. 511–520 (arXiv:2312.14931).
But

LLMs are amazing at code bases.

They search, read the few files that matter, change one line and run the checks. So we made the building a code base.

One record per file, in meaningful folders. Intent instead of meshes. Bodies, joins, openings and quantities are derived by an engine that checks every change before it is saved.

model/ ├ architecture/level-0/wall/w-3.json ├ architecture/level-0/door/d-12.json ├ structure/level-3/column/c-12-6.json └ types/architecture/wall/yv7.json $ ek request model '{"action":"execute", …}' - "along": 9000, + "along": 14000, ✓ saved · 1 file · the engine re-cut the wall
The same edits, on OpenEik

Right every time. And faster.

100%of edits right on OpenEik
39%on IFC, with the same agents
2.8×faster to a correct edit

Internal benchmark, October 2026: 18 edits per format on two large buildings, made by Claude Sonnet agents and judged by geometry against the engine.

Because it is a code base

Everything software has had for decades. Now for buildings.

Diffs

See exactly what changed: the door that moved, and nothing else.

~ doors/D-104.json x 4200 → 4800

Merges

Two people change different parts of the building, and the changes merge cleanly, because every element is its own file.

merge option-b → main · 0 conflicts

Full history

Every change, who made it, when and why, back to the first sketch. Any version can be brought back.

git log struct/L3/columns/C-12.json

Disciplines, side by side

Architecture, structure and MEP work in the same model at the same time, each in its own part of the tree.

arch/ struct/ mep/ site/

Many users

Everyone works on a branch. Changes are reviewed and merged, the way a software team works.

change #42 · approved by structure

Forks

Try a whole alternative design on a fork without touching the main model, and keep the better one.

fork main → timber-frame
What it adds up to

Finally, one model.
Always up to date.
For everyone.

No more hundreds of drawings and PDFs drifting out of step. One BIM model is the single source of truth that every discipline works against, and it is right there in ChatGPT, Claude or Copilot.

ArchitectMove the stair core 600 mm east.
Structural engineerWhich beams changed since Monday?
Project managerHow much façade is left to order on level 3?
Site engineerWhat is the opening height at grid C4?
ClientShow me the flats with south-facing balconies.

Build it. Change it. Measure it. Check it.

Fast.

An agent reads a model in tenths of a second and changes it with a validated command.

Reliable.

Every write is checked against the whole model. A change that would break it is refused with a reason.

Open source.

The standard and its engine core are open. IFC stays as a bridge for export and import.

The trailer
Coming next

EikHub

Where buildings branch, get reviewed and merge, the way software does.

OpenEik works today and is in testing with early users. It opens to the public in Q4 2026: the specification, the engine core and the benchmark.

Where the standard stands, and what comes next: the roadmap →

github.com/openeik

Building on OpenEik?

Show it.

Put the badge on your site or in your README when your tool reads and writes OpenEik folders that pass ek validate. The full conformance suite comes with the public release in Q4 2026.

See the apps that already work with OpenEik →

Supply building parts? Propose them inside the model →

SVG: light · dark   PNG: light · dark

OpenEik compatible
HTML<a href="https://openeik.org"><img src="https://openeik.org/badge/openeik-compatible-light.svg" alt="OpenEik compatible" height="40"></a>
Markdown[![OpenEik compatible](https://openeik.org/badge/openeik-compatible-light.svg)](https://openeik.org)